<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Is FOG still being actively developed?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Just curious since I’m a new user and never heard of it before a couple of weeks ago. Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>http://forums.fogproject.org/topic/1944/is-fog-still-being-actively-developed</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 01:20:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://forums.fogproject.org/topic/1944.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:42:59 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is FOG still being actively developed? on Sat, 22 Jun 2013 23:58:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Yes, FOG is still an active project. Version .33 is a major rewrite of the code, so it’s taking some time to complete.</p>
<p dir="auto">However, I’m glad that you’ve found FOG. If you run into any problems, you can post it to the forum and someone will be able to help you.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forums.fogproject.org/post/13216</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forums.fogproject.org/post/13216</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2013 23:58:50 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>